dr bob for saturday
College Best Bet Sides
2 Star Selection
KANSAS (+3.0) 23 Iowa St. 17
26-Nov-05 09:30 AM Pacific Time
Iowa State has been on a good run lately, winning 4
straight games and covering in 5 straight contests,
but the Cyclones are up against a highly motivated and
defensively stout Kansas team that needs to win this
game to become bowl eligible. Teams that are at .500
entering their final regular season game are a very
profitable 47-21 ATS at home since 1980 and the
Jayhawks apply to a very good 15-1 ATS subset of that
angle. Kansas was overwhelmed by a very good Texas
attack last week, but the Jayhawks' defense has still
only allowed 4.5 yards per play in their 7 conference
games this season - to teams that would combine to
average 6.0 yppl against an average defensive team -
so they should return to their normal dominating level
of play here at home (they've allowed just 2.9 yppl in
two Big 12 home games). Iowa State's offense has been
better since top back Stevie Hicks returned to the
lineup a few weeks ago, but the Cyclones are still a
below average running team in the 5 games with a
healthy Hicks (3.9 yards per rushing play against
teams that would allow 4.2 yprp to an average team)
and I rate the Cyclones' attack at 0.1 yppl worse than
average with Hicks in the lineup (instead of the 0.4
yppl worse than average that they are for the whole
season). The Kansas offense is 0.8 yppl worse than
average for the season (4.4 yppl against teams that
would allow 5.2 yppl to an average team), but they are
better since senior Jason Swanson took over at
quarterback 3 ½ games ago. Swanson's numbers aren't
great (5.1 yards per pass play), but he has faced
teams that would allow 5.2 yppp to an average
quarterback and his -0.1 yppp rating is much better
than the Jayhawks' season long passing numbers (4.4
yppp against teams that would allow 5.8 yppp to an
average team). Kansas rates at only 0.1 yppp with
Swanson at quarterback and he has cut down on his
interceptions the last two games (just 2 total) after
throwing 5 picks in his first 2 games. Iowa State has
a very good run defense (3.8 yprp allowed to teams
that would average 4.9 yprp against an average
defense), but their pass defense is only 0.1 yppp
better than average and the Cyclones' defensive rating
of 0.4 yppl better than average (4.8 yppl allowed to
teams that would combine to average 5.2 yppl against
an average defense) is not nearly as good as the
Kansas defense. The Cyclones do have outstanding
special teams that are 3.1 points better than the
Jayhawks' solid special teams units, and Iowa State
has a 4.1 points advantage in projected turnovers, but
my math model favors Iowa State by just 1 point in
this game and the Jayhawks have played their best
football at home, where they are now 9-2 ATS recently.
I'll take Kansas in a 2-Star Best Bet at +3 points or
more and I'll Downgrade Kansas to a Strong Opinion if
they become an underdog of less than 3 points.
3 Star Selection
Georgia (-3.5) 31 GEORGIA TECH 17
26-Nov-05 05:00 PM Pacific Time
Georgia Tech's upset win at Miami last week is
supplying us with line value in going against the
Yellow Jackets, who are also due for a letdown. Teams
that win straight up as a double-digit road underdog
are only 47-82-3 ATS at home the next week against an
equal or better opponent (i.e. when favored by 3
points or less or getting points), and Georgia Tech
applies to a 13-39-1 ATS subset of that angle. Defense
is Georgia Tech's calling card and the Yellow Jackets
have allowed just 4.9 yards per play in the 6 games
that star DE Eric Henderson has played in this season,
despite facing teams that would combine to average 5.9
yppl against an average defensive unit. However,
Georgia's offense is actually slightly better than
Georgia Tech's defense, as the Bulldogs rate at 1.2
yppl better than average (6.7 yppl against teams that
would allow 5.5 yppl to an average team) with D.J.
Shockley at quarterback (he missed their 10-14 loss to
Florida). Georgia Tech's offense continues to
struggle, as that unit has averaged only 4.9 yppl in 9
games with starting quarterback Reggie Ball at the
helm (he missed the Connecticut game) - against teams
that would allow 5.0 yppl to an average team.
Georgia's is only 0.5 yppl better than average (4.8
yppl allowed to teams that would average 5.3 yppl
against an average defensive team), but that unit has
a 0.6 yppl advantage over Georgia Tech's defense and
the Yellow Jackets' top running back, P.J. Daniels,
may be out again this week. The big difference in
these two teams is special teams, where Georgia ranks
among the best in the nation at +6.3 points per game
better than an average Division 1A team while Tech is
3.6 points per game worse than average in special
teams, which is horrid for a team from a BCS
conference. My special teams ratings have proven to be
one of the most important factors in my math model
(because other's don't give them enough weight) and
the math favors Georgia by 9 ½ points in this game.
So, we have some line value to go along with the
situation going against Georgia Tech and I'll take
Georgia in a 3-Star Best Bet at -4 points or less and
I'll Downgrade Georgia to a 2-Star Best Bet if they
are favored between 4 ½ and 6 points (a Strong Opinion
at more than -6 points).
3 Star Selection
STANFORD (+18.0) 24 Notre Dame 30
26-Nov-05 05:00 PM Pacific Time
As bad as Stanford's offense looked last week against
a fired up Cal defense, they are actually not that bad
of a team and the Cardinal should be able to score
enough points against a mediocre Notre Dame defense to
stay within the inflated number. Stanford had covered
the spread in 6 straight games prior to losing 3-27 to
Cal last week and the Cardinal are still an underrated
team, even if starting quarterback Trent Edwards (with
various injuries) cannot play. Stanford's offense has
been 0.2 yards per play worse than average for the
season, including their loss to UC Davis, as they have
averaged just 4.8 yppl against a schedule of teams
that would combine to allow 5.0 yppl to an average
team. The Cardinal attack is obviously better with
Trent Edwards in the game, as Edwards has averaged 5.9
yards per pass play (against teams that would allow
5.5 yppp to an average quarterback) while backup T.C.
Ostrander has averaged just 4.3 yppp (against teams
that would allow 5.4 yppp to an average quarterback).
With Edwards playing the entire game, the Cardinal
offense is average on a national scale and the
Cardinal attack would be 0.8 yppl worse than average
if Ostrander is forced to start and plays at the level
he's shown in his 61 pass plays so far this season. To
be on the safe side, I am going to assume that
Ostrander is at quarterback in this game. Notre Dame's
defense is only 0.1 yppl better than average, allowing
5.6 yppl to teams that would average 5.7 yppl against
an average defense and my math model projects 314
total yards at 4.6 yppl for Stanford in this game with
Ostrander at quarterback. Notre Dame's potent attack
(6.1 yppl against teams that would combine to allow
5.1 yppl to an average team) will obviously perform
better than that against a Stanford defense that is
only 0.1 yppl better than average (5.7 yppl allowed to
teams that would average 5.8 yppl against an average
team). My math model projects 448 yards at 6.2 yppl
for Notre Dame in this game, but Stanford has very
good special teams that are 4.1 points better than
Notre Dame's special teams and very good special teams
is partly why the Cardinal has been deceivingly good
in covering 6 of their last 7 games. The Irish do have
a 1.9 points edge in projected turnovers, but the
overall math favors Notre Dame by just 11 points with
Ostrander at quarterback for Stanford. The math would
favor the Irish by only 4 ½ points if Edwards plays
the entire game at his normal level. Either way, there
is line value on the side of a Cardinal team that is
playing for the right to go to a Bowl game. Teams that
are at .500 on the season are 47-21 ATS at home in
their final game of the season and that record is an
even better 15-1 ATS if they are coming off a bad game
(a loss and spread loss). Also, final game home
underdogs of more than 7 points are good bets after a
straight up and ATS loss if facing team that does not
have revenge against them, and the Cardinal apply to a
33-10-2 ATS situation that is based on that premise.
When both of those situations apply the record is 3-0
with 2 straight up wins for dogs of +14 points and +9
points. My math model has been correct every time it
has picked on Stanford (with a 6 point differential or
more) and the math correctly picked against the Irish
last week as big favorite against a horrible Syracuse
team. Stanford is even more underrated after last
week's debacle and the Irish are overrated since the
public is blinded by the good offense and tend to
forget that their defense is suspect. This game
reminds me a lot of my Best Bet win on Stanford +7
over UCLA (also with a mediocre defense, in which the
Cardinal built a 21 point 4th quarter lead before
losing in overtime. The Cardinal also beat Arizona
State 45-35 as a 10 point home dog and their offense
has consistently performed well against mediocre
defensive teams this season. It was reported early on
Thursday morning that Trent Edwards will be the
starting quarterback for Standord, which makes me feel
better about this play. I would have taken Stanford as
a Best Bet even if Ostrander was the starter, but I'll
take Stanford in a 3-Star Best Bet at +17 points or
more with Edwards at quarterback.
I'll Downgrade Stanford to a 2-Star Best Bet if they
become an underdog of less than 17 points (a Strong
Opinion at less than +14 points).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
College Strong Opinions
WEST VIRGINIA (-14.5) 31 Pittsburgh 10
24-Nov-05 05:00 PM Pacific Time
West Virginia is still an underrated team despite
winning and covering the spread in 4 consecutive
games. My math model has been riding the Mountaineers
and the math favors them again this week, as does a
pretty solid 87-40-2 ATS late season home favorite
angle. Pittsburgh has a good defense (4.8 yards per
play allowed to teams that would average 5.5 yppl
against an average team), but West Virginia has a much
better stop unit that rates at 1.6 yppl better than
average (4.2 yppl allowed to teams that would combine
to average 5.8 yppl against an average defensive
team). The Mountaineers are also significantly better
on the offensive side of the ball, as they rate at 0.2
yppl better than average with dynamic frosh
quarterback Pat White at the controls while Pittsburgh
is 0.8 yppl worse than average on offense (4.6 yppl
against teams that would allow 5.4 yppl to an average
team). White had been splitting time with Adam
Bednarik for most of the season, but White played so
well when Bednarik was injured that he is now
entrenched at quarterback even though Bednarik is now
healthy. White has averaged 6.7 yards per pass play
(against teams that would allow 6.0 yppp to an average
quarterback) and he has run for 497 yards on 71 runs
(7.1 yards per rushing play). My math model favors
West Virginia by 19 points in this game and the
Mounties are 16-4 ATS under coach Rodriguez in
conference games when not favored by 14 points or
more. West Virginia is a Strong Opinion at -14 ½ or
more, but I'll make West Virginia a 2-Star Best Bet if
they are favored by 14 points or less.
EAST CAROLINA (+5.5) 33 UAB 31
26-Nov-05 09:00 AM Pacific Time
East Carolina won as a dog on the road for me last
week and I'll take the underrated Pirates getting
points at home this week. UAB does have a very good
quarterback in Darrell Hackney and the Blazers' attack
is 0.8 yards per play better than average (6.5 yppl
against teams that would allow 5.7 yppl to an average
team). East Carolina's defense is 0.6 yppl worse than
average (5.6 yppl allowed to teams that would average
5.0 yppl against an average team), so UAB has an
overall advantage of 1.4 yppl when they have the ball.
East Carolina, however, also has a veteran quarterback
in James Pinkney and the Pirates are 0.1 yppl better
than average offensively (5.8 yppl against teams that
would allow 5.7 yppl to an average team). UAB's
defense that is 0.4 yppl worse than average (5.3 yppl
allowed to teams that would combine to average 4.9
yppl against an average team), so the Pirates should
move the ball well when they have the ball given their
0.5 yppl advantage over UAB's defense. UAB does have
an overall 0.9 yppl advantage from the line of
scrimmage and my math model forecasts the Blazers to
out-gain the Pirates by 32 total yards (after
adjusting for ECU's home field advantage). However,
UAB's Achilles heal is their poor special teams and
East Carolina's good special teams have a 6.2 points
advantage in this game. My special teams are a big
reason my math model has done so well this season, as
most handicappers and the linesmakers don't give
enough credit for the field position that special
teams accounts for. Overall, my math model favors East
Carolina by 2 ½ points and UAB is also only 4-10 ATS
as a favorite in conference play the last 4 years,
including 1-4 ATS this season, while East Carolina is
6-2 ATS this season as an underdog. I'll consider East
Carolina a Strong Opinion in this game at +3 points or
more.
KENTUCKY (+9.5) 23 Tennessee 26
26-Nov-05 09:30 AM Pacific Time
Tennessee is 0-12 ATS in their last 12 games as a
favorite, including 0-6 ATS this season and I don't
mind favoring an underrated Kentucky squad that has
covered 5 straight home games. The Vols are still a
good defensive team (4.8 yards per play allowed to
teams that would average 5.7 yppl against an average
defense), but the Vols' attack has been 0.4 yppl worse
than average this season, which is horrible for an SEC
team. Tennessee is better offensively with Rick
Clausen at quarterback and they are a better running
team with Arian Foster as the featured back in place
of injured Gerald Riggs. With Clausen and Foster the
Volunteers rate at 0.1 yppl worse than average
offensively and that unit should move the ball pretty
well against a Kentucky defense that is 0.5 yppl worse
than average (6.0 yppl allowed to teams that would
average 5.5 yppl against an average team) since
injuries took an early toll on the Wildcats' defense
in week 2. Kentucky's offense is only 0.2 yppl worse
than average now that top receiver Keenan Burton is
back in the lineup (he missed 4 games in the middle of
the season), but Tennessee's good defense has a big
edge in that match-up. Overall, Tennessee has a
significant advantage from the line of scrimmage but
Kentucky's outstanding special teams are 6.0 points
better than Tennessee's sub-par special teams units
and the math favors Tennessee by only 3 ½ points in
this game. I'll consider Kentucky a Strong Opinion in
this game.
Virginia (+18.5) 14 MIAMI FLA 27
26-Nov-05 12:30 PM Pacific Time
Miami could be a bit flat after seeing their slim
chance of being a part of the National Championship
game end with a loss to Georgia Tech last week. Teams
that lose as a double-digit favorite usually do not
rebound the next week and the Hurricanes apply to a
negative 44-70-2 ATS situation that is based on that
premise. Virginia, meanwhile, applies to a 97-41-2 ATS
blowout bounce-back situation that was brought on by
last week's 14-52 loss to Virginia Tech. The Cavaliers
are certainly not a great team, as their offense is
just average (5.3 yards per play against teams that
would allow 5.3 yppl to an average offensive team)
with quarterback Marques Hagans on the field and their
defense has only been 0.1 yppl better than average
this season (5.2 yppl allowed to teams that would
average 5.3 yppl against an average team). That unit
did get better with the return to healthy of
All-American LB Ahmad Brooks and they are 0.4 yppl
better than average since he returned to full-time
playing status. Miami's offense is just 0.4 yppl
better than average without star running back Tyrone
Moss, but the Hurricanes' dominating defense (3.6 yppl
allowed to teams that would average 5.4 yppl against
an average stop unit) has a huge advantage over the
Cavaliers' offense. Virginia does have an advantage in
special teams and my math model favors Miami by 18
points, which is where the oddsmakers have the game.
While we don't have any line value, the situations
favoring Virginia give the Cavs a profitable 56.8%
chance of covering and their bad road record (9-17 ATS
under coach Al Groh) isn't as bad if they are coming
off a loss (4-5 ATS) or if they have the revenge
motive (3-2 ATS), so I'll consider Virginia a Strong
Opinion at +17 points or more. Upgrade Virginia to a
2-Star Best Bet if they become an underdog of 21
points or more.