AGAINST THE SPREAD......

INTERESTING WRITE UP I FOUND:

An angle worth exploring....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One thing that I have found over the years is that in College Football, the linesmakers tend to be slow to adjust to a team that turns out to be a lot better than expected (or worse) - particulary in the smaller markets where the "market" isn't as efficient.

So for that reason, I keep a running spreadsheet each year of every team and their record against the spread. Usually at least 3-4 teams make it 8-9 games into the season (if not all the way through) covering every single game.

The other thing I track is "by how much" these teams cover (or fail to cover) the spread. If it's within a TD it counts, but I give extra credence to teams that blow the number out of the water. For instance, UCLA beat the spread in week 1 by 15 1/2 pts. Then in week 2, they covered by 17. In week 3, they still covered by 10 1/2. Oddsmakers are too slow to react in college football. UCLA is better than advertised.

So here are the stats right now-

27 teams have yet to lose ATS

26 teams have yet to win ATS

Here's the games to look at this week where these teams play against EACH OTHER:

Minnesota -3- over Purdue ---- Minnesota has covered all 3 games, two of which they beat the number by 16 & 19 respectively. Purdue has failed to cover their only decision - by 11 pts (they tied against Arizona) I LOVE this play.

LSU -6- over Tennessee ----

LSU covered their only game - against Arizona State, although it was a bit of a lucky victory, so I put less credence in this one. Tennessee has failed to cover both games - one (UAB) by 17 pts.

Iowa State -17 over Army (Friday) ---

Iowa State has covered their only decision against Iowa by 29 pts. (Again, a rivalry game so we might put less faith in this) Army has failed to cover every game this season.

Others to seriously consider:

Illinois +10- over Michigan State - Illinois has covered all 3 games this year, and they are a home dog going against a Spartan team coming off a very emotional, tight victory on the road. 2nd straight road game - getting points - taking an underrated team. I LOVE this play.

Wyoming +2- over Mississippi - I have actually won money on Wyoming every game this year. They legitimately have a good team and nobody realizes it yet. They've covered all 3 games - one of which they covered by 17.5 pts. Mississippi is atrocious. And you get 2 1/2 pts!

Wisconsin +3 over Michigan - Wisconsin has covered all 3 games - two of which they crushed the number (by 10 and 32) Plus - they are at home, and just MIGHT be a better team than Michigan this year.

Ohio -4 over Kent State - Kent State has failed to cover both games - and neither was close. (17 & 10.5) Ohio is a decent team, despite what Va Tech's NFL defense did to them.

Anyway - heres all the other teams that have covered each week......

Akron, Baylor, Cincy, Clemson, ECarolina, FSU, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa St, LSU, Marshall, Minnesota, Navy, N.Illinois, Oregon, S Florida, So Miss, Texas, Texas Tech, UAB, UCLA, USC, Vandy, VT, WVa, Wisconsin & Wyoming.

UAB, UCLA, USC, Vandy, Wisconsin & Va Tech in particular have been CRUSHING the numbers

User Avatar

posted by phantom

Sept. 22, 2005 7:03pm
22 views

Post a reply:

You must to post a reply.

got picks? — Where Sports Handicappers Share Winning Strategies

Join thousands of sports handicappers sharing expert picks, proven strategies, and insider insights. Whether you're posting your analysis or following top performers, our community helps you make smarter betting decisions and potentially increase your profits.

Why Choose got picks?

  • 📊 Expert Analysis: Daily picks from proven handicappers
  • 💬 Active Community: Real-time discussions and strategy sharing
  • 📈 Track Record: Follow users with proven winning histories
  • 🎯 Multiple Sports: NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, and more