3 replies:

1. I'm with you.  i got the Colts -5 yesterday.  now it's up to -6.   probably will settle in around 7 by the time the game gets here.  Even then it'd be worth it.  Colts by 10.  right around 27-17.

    

   I like the under 56 as well.  

   

   posted by stantheman

   Jan. 25, 2010 5:49pm
2. I just want to make clear to everyone that I lost every bet in the last 2 weeks; although the last one was all Brett's fault.  Actually, it's all Childress' fault as he was a loser when he was the O coordinator with the Eagles and he still is.  He has no freaking killer instinct.  If I was the coach, I would've ran the quarterback draw twice and kicked the  ball.  They were already well within Longwell's range and they even said on TV that he was making every 50 yarder in the pre-game warm up.

   Anyway, please don't take me seriously when I said "Bet the house".  Honestly, my best advice to you is wait until what Takis picks and go with him.

   

   posted by jkecc

   Jan. 25, 2010 6:00pm
3. This is "your nut", with you being the proverbial blind squirrel.

    

   good article for why the Colts should win easily.  basically, they are the better team, and take care of the ball like the Vikings didn't.

   http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/czar-super-bowl-early-look-012510

   

   posted by stantheman

   Jan. 25, 2010 6:10pm