4 replies:

1. got csu at +3 (now off board on one of my books b/c of poss suspensions. barring anything drastic really like this one.

   also adding buffalo large. cant take rutgers to cover this large of a spread until i see how their run game looks w/o lenard blocking for rice. teel had a very streaky yr last yr and wldnt count on him to light up the scoreboard. also, buffalo returns most of their starters. this has been the case the last two yrs and iit hasnt helped any, but i believe barring many t/o's or special team collapses, this one stays under the number.

   also, adding illionois. good coach who has brought in great recruiting classes. they are a home dog and the pub seems to be heavy on mizzou.

   card so far:

   large

   buffalo +32

   csu +3

   ave

   duke +4

   illionos +4.5

   

   posted by terpkeg

   Aug. 30, 2007 2:23pm
2. not the way i wanted to start yr off w/ buff, but it is a long season. really frustrating how they couldnt stick the ball in the endzone in the 2nd half after some decent drives. moving on to friday.

   navy/temple over 52. navy returns rb's and qb, temple was last in ncaa at stopping the run last yr. however, navy has 8 new starters on def. so like the over better than the -21.

   syracuse +3.5- the cuse played decent ball in the dome last yr. while wash was horredous on the road. both teams bring in new qbs this yr. wash will have to prove they are not the team that ended last yr as one of the worst in the country. dont think they desevr to be laying over a field goal.

   

   posted by terpkeg

   Aug. 31, 2007 3:51pm
3. 0-3 to start the year.

   did some research on these games, but no need for write-ups as hopefully no one will be tailing me until i can get my shit together.

   illionois up to +5.5 making this large

   adding purdue -6.5

   akron -6

   texas -39

   

   posted by terpkeg

   Sept. 1, 2007 11:43am
4. this is getting ugly, but adding wake 2nd half +3.5

   

   posted by terpkeg

   Sept. 1, 2007 5:23pm